MOSP / 期刊 / 文化法学评论 / 2024年·第1卷·第1期
栏目:理论前沿封面文章

论文化法学的学科演进、时代维度与建构逻辑

Discussing on the Discipline Evolution , Temporal Dimensions, and Constructive Logic of Cultural Jurisprudence

 作者:石东坡1*
法学部,厦门行政学院,福建厦门
* 通信作者:石东坡,单位:法学部,厦门行政学院,福建厦门
 
提交:2024-10-18修改:2024-11-27录用:2024-12-15出版:2024-12-26
文化法学评论, 2024, 1(1), 18-34; https://doi.org/10.12414/clr.240385
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目(编号:23ZDA077)。
摘 要:
摘要:文化法学因应文化实践活动全过程法治化的时代吁求,历经倡导、探索而确立并在逐步形成共识性、基础性的学科原理及其知识体系的新阶段,新时代的中国式现代化、文化强国、人民文化权利和公民文化权益的需求与实现在法治体系健全完善进程中赋予文化法学以具体的规定性,使之在自主知识体系的逻辑建构中具有不同以往和域外的新面相。其中,以人民文化权利(力)为逻辑起点,以文化资源、文化创造【更多...】
关键词:文化法学;文化法治;文化法制;中国式法治现代化
关键词: 文化法学;文化法治;文化法制;中国式法治现代化

摘要 / Abstract

摘要:文化法学因应文化实践活动全过程法治化的时代吁求,历经倡导、探索而确立并在逐步形成共识性、基础性的学科原理及其知识体系的新阶段,新时代的中国式现代化、文化强国、人民文化权利和公民文化权益的需求与实现在法治体系健全完善进程中赋予文化法学以具体的规定性,使之在自主知识体系的逻辑建构中具有不同以往和域外的新面相。其中,以人民文化权利(力)为逻辑起点,以文化资源、文化创造、文化服务、文化产业、文化传播和文化互鉴等为现实依托,以文化产权、文化权利、文化职责、文化主权等为基本范畴,按照文化实践全过程及其关键环节所形成的逻辑主线,辩证对待党规与国法、硬法与软法、法律体系与法治体系、集体与个体方法论,合理适度明晰学科边界,决定、赋能、形塑和界定着当代中国文化法学。
关键词:文化法学;文化法治;文化法制;中国式法治现代化
 
Abstract: In response to the call of the times for the legalization of the entire process of cultural practice activities, cultural law has established and gradually formed a new stage of consensus, basic discipline principles and knowledge system after advocacy and exploration. The needs and realization of Chinese modernization, cultural power, people's cultural rights and citizens' cultural rights in the new era have given cultural law specific regulations in the process of improving the legal system,so that it has a new aspect different from the past and outside the region in the logical construction of the independent knowledge system. Based on the reality of cultural resources, cultural creation, cultural services, cultural industries, cultural communication and cultural mutual learning, with cultural property rights, cultural rights, cultural responsibilities and cultural sovereignty as the basic categories, and in accordance with the logical main line formed by the whole process of cultural practice and its key links, Dialectical treatment of party regulations and state law, hard law and soft law, legal system and rule of law system, collective and individual methodology, reasonable and moderate clear discipline boundaries, determines, empowers, shapes and defines contemporary Chinese cultural law
Keywords: Cultural Law; Cultural Rule of Law; Cultural Legal System; Modernization of Chinese Rule of Law
 

正文 / Content

正文内容:可下载全文PDF查阅,并按照本文版权申明进行使用。
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

版权 / License


本文是一篇遵循创作共用许可证(CC BY 4.0)的开放获取文章,版权为本文作者所有,许可证持有人为澳门科学出版社。
This article is an open access article that follows the Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0),the copyright belongs to the author of this article, and the license holder is Macao Scientific Publishers, Macao, China.
CC BY 4.0
© 2024 作者版权所有。许可出版:澳门科学出版社(MOSP),中国澳门。本文为开放获取文章,依据知识共享署名(CC BY 4.0)许可协议的条款和条件分发。 © 2024 by the authors. Published by Macao Scientific Publishers (MOSP), Macao, China. This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license.
免责声明: 本期刊所发表文章中的所有陈述、观点和数据均为作者和贡献者的个人观点,不代表澳门科学出版社及/或编辑的立场。澳门科学出版社及/或编辑不对文中提及的任何思想、方法、说明或产品所导致的人身或财产伤害承担责任。 Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in this journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of MOSP and/or the editors. MOSP and/or the editors disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Submit Your Manuscript Now
0.084170s