MOSP / 期刊 / 文化法学评论 / 2024年·第1卷·第1期
栏目:学术专论封面文章

对劣迹艺人“封杀令”的合法性检视与规范性建构

Legitimacy Review and Normative Construction of the "Ban Order" on Tainted Stars

 作者:杨吉1*
浙江传媒学院,浙江杭州
* 通信作者:杨吉,单位:浙江传媒学院,浙江杭州
 
提交:2024-07-30修改:2024-11-27录用:2024-12-15出版:2024-12-26
文化法学评论, 2024, 1(1), 35-44; https://doi.org/10.12414/clr.240386
资助/贡献:作者自筹研究经费,无其它利益冲突需要特别说明。
摘 要:
摘要:我国对失德失范、违法违规的艺人采取一律“封杀”的惩戒已经成为国内文娱行业规范治理的一种常态化和长效性机制。但学界和业界围绕该措施的正当性与成效性却颇有争议且分歧不小,主要集中在“劣迹艺人”概念的缺省、定义的缺失以及在法理层面欠缺逻辑的自洽和制度的完备。对劣迹艺人应当视具体行为和情节,划定不同等级,以便施以对等的惩戒措施。对于限制或禁止劣迹艺人行业准入,监管机构应【更多...】
关键词:劣迹艺人;封杀令;规范性文件;合法性审查
关键词: 劣迹艺人;封杀令;规范性文件;合法性审查

摘要 / Abstract

摘要:我国对失德失范、违法违规的艺人采取一律“封杀”的惩戒已经成为国内文娱行业规范治理的一种常态化和长效性机制。但学界和业界围绕该措施的正当性与成效性却颇有争议且分歧不小,主要集中在“劣迹艺人”概念的缺省、定义的缺失以及在法理层面欠缺逻辑的自洽和制度的完备。对劣迹艺人应当视具体行为和情节,划定不同等级,以便施以对等的惩戒措施。对于限制或禁止劣迹艺人行业准入,监管机构应确保有公正、公开的听证程序和申诉机制,赋予当事人充分的答辩和救济权利。同时,借鉴国际治理的模式和经验,发挥行业协会的主观能动性,尊重市场自由选择的规律。特别是在制定制裁措施时,要避免过激和过度的手段,不宜一味地封禁劣迹艺人,更不能牵连其之前辛勤付出的作品正常播映。
关键词:劣迹艺人;封杀令;规范性文件;合法性审查
 
Abstract: In China, the punitive measure of universally "banning" artists who have committed moral or legal violations has become a normalized and long-term mechanism for regulating the domestic entertainment industry. However, there is considerable debate and disagreement in both academic and industry circles regarding the legitimacy and effectiveness of this measure. The main points of contention focus on the lack of a clear definition for the concept of "problematic artists," the absence of a precise definition, and the insufficient logical coherence and completeness of the system at the legal level. Tainted stars should be assessed based on their specific actions and circumstances, with different levels established to apply corresponding punitive measures. When restricting or prohibiting problematic artists from entering the industry, regulatory bodies should ensure fair and transparent hearing procedures and appeal mechanisms, granting the parties involved adequate rights to defense and redress. At the same time, it is important to draw on international governance models and experiences, leverage the proactive role of industry associations, and respect the principles of market freedom of choice. Particularly when formulating sanctions, it is essential to avoid extreme and excessive measures, and not to indiscriminately ban problematic artists, nor should their previous hard work and contributions be affected by the normal broadcasting of their works.
Keywords: Tainted Stars; Ban; Normative Documents; Legality Review
 

正文 / Content

正文内容:可下载全文PDF查阅,并按照本文版权申明进行使用。
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

版权 / License


本文是一篇遵循创作共用许可证(CC BY 4.0)的开放获取文章,版权为本文作者所有,许可证持有人为澳门科学出版社。
This article is an open access article that follows the Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0),the copyright belongs to the author of this article, and the license holder is Macao Scientific Publishers, Macao, China.
CC BY 4.0
© 2024 作者版权所有。许可出版:澳门科学出版社(MOSP),中国澳门。本文为开放获取文章,依据知识共享署名(CC BY 4.0)许可协议的条款和条件分发。 © 2024 by the authors. Published by Macao Scientific Publishers (MOSP), Macao, China. This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license.
免责声明: 本期刊所发表文章中的所有陈述、观点和数据均为作者和贡献者的个人观点,不代表澳门科学出版社及/或编辑的立场。澳门科学出版社及/或编辑不对文中提及的任何思想、方法、说明或产品所导致的人身或财产伤害承担责任。 Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in this journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of MOSP and/or the editors. MOSP and/or the editors disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Submit Your Manuscript Now
0.112334s