栏目：学术专论

我国演出行业的监管实践与理论逻辑

Regulatory Practices and Theoretical Logic in China’s Performance Industry

作者：郑宁¹^*

¹文化产业管理学院法律系，中国传媒大学，北京

^*通信作者：郑宁，单位：文化产业管理学院法律系，中国传媒大学，北京

提交：2024-08-30修改：2024-10-30录用：2024-12-15出版：2024-12-26

文化法学评论, 2024, 1(1), 45-53; https://doi.org/10.12414/clr.240387

资助/贡献：作者自筹研究经费，无其它利益冲突需要特别说明。

摘要：

摘要：我国演出行业监管实践主要集中于规范网络演出、加强演出资质管理、加强内容监管、严厉打击黄牛炒票行为、扶持演出行业这五个方面。演出行业监管的理论逻辑可以概括为双效统一、合作治理和包容审慎监管三个原则。演出行业应当加强协同监管和精准监管，推【更多...】

关键词：演出行业；监管；双效统一；合作治理；包容审慎监管

关键词： 演出行业；监管；双效统一；合作治理；包容审慎监管

摘要 / Abstract

摘要：我国演出行业监管实践主要集中于规范网络演出、加强演出资质管理、加强内容监管、严厉打击黄牛炒票行为、扶持演出行业这五个方面。演出行业监管的理论逻辑可以概括为双效统一、合作治理和包容审慎监管三个原则。演出行业应当加强协同监管和精准监管，推动演出行业健康有序发展。

关键词：演出行业；监管；双效统一；合作治理；包容审慎监管

Abstract: The regulatory practices of China's performing arts industry are mainly concentrated on standardizing online performances, strengthening regulation on performance qualification, enhancing content regulation, severely cracking down on scalping tickets by scalpers, and supporting the development of the performing arts industry. The theoretical logic of performing arts industry regulation can be summarized in three principles of unification of dual effects, collaborative governance, and inclusive and prudential regulation. It is necessary to strengthen coordinated regulation and targeted regulation to promote the healthy and orderly development of the performing arts industry.

Keywords: Performing Arts Industry; Regulation; Unification of Dual Effects; Collaborative Governance; Inclusive and Prudential Regulatio

正文 / Content

正文内容：可下载全文PDF查阅，并按照本文版权申明进行使用。

Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

版权 / License

本文是一篇遵循创作共用许可证（CC BY 4.0）的开放获取文章，版权为本文作者所有，许可证持有人为澳门科学出版社。
This article is an open access article that follows the Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0)，the copyright belongs to the author of this article, and the license holder is Macao Scientific Publishers, Macao, China.